linux-kernel - Re: undefined shift in wb_update_dirty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151207142621.GA7012@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date:	Mon, 7 Dec 2015 09:26:21 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...n.com>
Cc:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: undefined shift in wb_update_dirty_ratelimit()

Hello, Andrey.

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05:17:06PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> I've hit undefined shift in wb_update_dirty_ratelimit() which does some
> mysterious 'step' calculations:
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Don't pursue 100% rate matching. It's impossible since the balanced
> 	 * rate itself is constantly fluctuating. So decrease the track speed
> 	 * when it gets close to the target. Helps eliminate pointless tremors.
> 	 */
> 	step >>= dirty_ratelimit / (2 * step + 1);
> 
> 
> dirty_ratelimit = INIT_BW and step = 0 results in this:
> 
> [ 5006.957366] ================================================================================
> [ 5006.957798] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ../mm/page-writeback.c:1286:7
> [ 5006.958091] shift exponent 25600 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'

We prolly should do sth like

	shift = dirty_ratelimit / (2 * step = 1);
	if (shift < BITS_PER_LONG) {
		step = (step >> shift) + 7 / 8;
	} else {
		step = 0;
	}

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/