linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.3 049/125] x86/fpu: Fix 32-bit signal frame handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151207145754.721900928@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon,  7 Dec 2015 10:01:02 -0500
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, dave@...1.net,
	fenghua.yu@...el.com, yu-cheng.yu@...el.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.3 049/125] x86/fpu: Fix 32-bit signal frame handling

4.3-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>

commit ab6b52947545a5355154f64f449f97af9d05845f upstream.

(This should have gone to LKML originally. Sorry for the extra
 noise, folks on the cc.)

Background:

Signal frames on x86 have two formats:

  1. For 32-bit executables (whether on a real 32-bit kernel or
     under 32-bit emulation on a 64-bit kernel) we have a
    'fpregset_t' that includes the "FSAVE" registers.

  2. For 64-bit executables (on 64-bit kernels obviously), the
     'fpregset_t' is smaller and does not contain the "FSAVE"
     state.

When creating the signal frame, we have to be aware of whether
we are running a 32 or 64-bit executable so we create the
correct format signal frame.

Problem:

save_xstate_epilog() uses 'fx_sw_reserved_ia32' whenever it is
called for a 32-bit executable.  This is for real 32-bit and
ia32 emulation.

But, fpu__init_prepare_fx_sw_frame() only initializes
'fx_sw_reserved_ia32' when emulation is enabled, *NOT* for real
32-bit kernels.

This leads to really wierd situations where 32-bit programs
lose their extended state when returning from a signal handler.
The kernel copies the uninitialized (zero) 'fx_sw_reserved_ia32'
out to userspace in save_xstate_epilog().  But when returning
from the signal, the kernel errors out in check_for_xstate()
when it does not see FP_XSTATE_MAGIC1 present (because it was
zeroed).  This leads to the FPU/XSAVE state being initialized.

For MPX, this leads to the most permissive state and means we
silently lose bounds violations.  I think this would also mean
that we could lose *ANY* FPU/SSE/AVX state.  I'm not sure why
no one has spotted this bug.

I believe this was broken by:

	72a671ced66d ("x86, fpu: Unify signal handling code paths for x86 and x86_64 kernels")

way back in 2012.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: dave@...1.net
Cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com
Cc: yu-cheng.yu@...el.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151111002354.A0799571@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c |   11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
@@ -385,20 +385,19 @@ fpu__alloc_mathframe(unsigned long sp, i
  */
 void fpu__init_prepare_fx_sw_frame(void)
 {
-	int fsave_header_size = sizeof(struct fregs_state);
 	int size = xstate_size + FP_XSTATE_MAGIC2_SIZE;

-	if (config_enabled(CONFIG_X86_32))
-		size += fsave_header_size;
-
 	fx_sw_reserved.magic1 = FP_XSTATE_MAGIC1;
 	fx_sw_reserved.extended_size = size;
 	fx_sw_reserved.xfeatures = xfeatures_mask;
 	fx_sw_reserved.xstate_size = xstate_size;

-	if (config_enabled(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION)) {
+	if (config_enabled(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) ||
+	    config_enabled(CONFIG_X86_32)) {
+		int fsave_header_size = sizeof(struct fregs_state);
+
 		fx_sw_reserved_ia32 = fx_sw_reserved;
-		fx_sw_reserved_ia32.extended_size += fsave_header_size;
+		fx_sw_reserved_ia32.extended_size = size + fsave_header_size;
 	}
 }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/