lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon,  7 Dec 2015 09:55:43 -0500
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2 053/124] KVM: x86: work around infinite loop in microcode when #AC is delivered

4.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>

commit 54a20552e1eae07aa240fa370a0293e006b5faed upstream.

It was found that a guest can DoS a host by triggering an infinite
stream of "alignment check" (#AC) exceptions.  This causes the
microcode to enter an infinite loop where the core never receives
another interrupt.  The host kernel panics pretty quickly due to the
effects (CVE-2015-5307).

Signed-off-by: Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h |    1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c              |    8 ++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c              |    5 ++++-
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@
 	{ SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + UD_VECTOR,       "UD excp" }, \
 	{ SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + PF_VECTOR,       "PF excp" }, \
 	{ SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + NM_VECTOR,       "NM excp" }, \
+	{ SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + AC_VECTOR,       "AC excp" }, \
 	{ SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + MC_VECTOR,       "MC excp" }, \
 	{ SVM_EXIT_INTR,        "interrupt" }, \
 	{ SVM_EXIT_NMI,         "nmi" }, \
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1106,6 +1106,7 @@ static void init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *s
 	set_exception_intercept(svm, PF_VECTOR);
 	set_exception_intercept(svm, UD_VECTOR);
 	set_exception_intercept(svm, MC_VECTOR);
+	set_exception_intercept(svm, AC_VECTOR);
 
 	set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_INTR);
 	set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_NMI);
@@ -1794,6 +1795,12 @@ static int ud_interception(struct vcpu_s
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static int ac_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
+{
+	kvm_queue_exception_e(&svm->vcpu, AC_VECTOR, 0);
+	return 1;
+}
+
 static void svm_fpu_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
@@ -3368,6 +3375,7 @@ static int (*const svm_exit_handlers[])(
 	[SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + PF_VECTOR]	= pf_interception,
 	[SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + NM_VECTOR]	= nm_interception,
 	[SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + MC_VECTOR]	= mc_interception,
+	[SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + AC_VECTOR]	= ac_interception,
 	[SVM_EXIT_INTR]				= intr_interception,
 	[SVM_EXIT_NMI]				= nmi_interception,
 	[SVM_EXIT_SMI]				= nop_on_interception,
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ static void update_exception_bitmap(stru
 	u32 eb;
 
 	eb = (1u << PF_VECTOR) | (1u << UD_VECTOR) | (1u << MC_VECTOR) |
-	     (1u << NM_VECTOR) | (1u << DB_VECTOR);
+	     (1u << NM_VECTOR) | (1u << DB_VECTOR) | (1u << AC_VECTOR);
 	if ((vcpu->guest_debug &
 	     (KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP)) ==
 	    (KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP))
@@ -5117,6 +5117,9 @@ static int handle_exception(struct kvm_v
 		return handle_rmode_exception(vcpu, ex_no, error_code);
 
 	switch (ex_no) {
+	case AC_VECTOR:
+		kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, AC_VECTOR, error_code);
+		return 1;
 	case DB_VECTOR:
 		dr6 = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION);
 		if (!(vcpu->guest_debug &


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ