linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] spi: lm70llp: remove multiple blank lines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151208043259.GA23610@sudip-pc>
Date:	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:03:00 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] spi: lm70llp: remove multiple blank lines

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:07:37PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:17:28PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > checkpatch complains about multiple blank lines.
> 
> Please don't resubmit already applied patches, please submit against the
> latest development code for the subsystem you're submitting to (unless
> the change is a bug fix that should go to Linus).

I think there is some confusion. I am not seeing v1 of these patches in
for-next branch of your spi tree. And in review of v1 you said to use
dev_*. And for that last 2 patch of v1 changed and one extra came so I
sent the whole series as v2.

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/