linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH kernel] rcu: Define lockless version of list_for_each_entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Dec 2015 21:46:25 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>
Cc:	Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel] rcu: Define lockless version of
 list_for_each_entry_rcu

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:20:03PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 06:19:46PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > 
> > As in the following?  (And yes, I was confused by the fact that the
> > docbook header was in front of a differently-named macro!)
> 
> That looks great!  Have you committed to one of your branches?

Indeed I have, though quite recently.  Please see branch rcu/dev of:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git

Or, more specifically, this commit: 69b907297f4e

If your testing goes well, I will push this into the upcoming merge
window.

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/