[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151208132753.GD6373@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:27:53 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: vincent.weaver@...ne.edu, jolsa@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, eranian@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, acme@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Use INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST for cycles:
ppp
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:57:07AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:50:26AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:36:04AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > So I checked my NHM box with your latest queue and it now works correctly. Do you
> > > have any idea what the difference is/was?
> >
> > Sadly, no clue :/
> >
> > I went over those patches and cannot find anything that should affect
> > NHM (or <=SNB in fact).
>
> Oh wait, I spoke too soon, the two new patches affect everything with
> PEBS. And esp. the latter one:
>
> lkml.kernel.org/r/1449177740-5422-2-git-send-email-andi@...stfloor.org
>
If that is the patch that makes your NHM go again, then running 2
concurrent perf-top sessions should make it all go dark again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists