[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5666EA49.2030206@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:33:45 -0500
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
cov@...eaurora.org, jcm@...hat.com, agross@...eaurora.org,
arnd@...db.de, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 3/3] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA channel
driver
On 12/5/2015 3:00 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:04:05PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>>>> You are missing the point. Channel can be paused, yes but the descriptor
>>>>> is in queue and is not paused. The descriptor running is paused, yes.
>>>>> There is subtle difference between these
>>> I'll follow your recommendation. PAUSE for the currently active
>>> descriptor and DMA_IN_PROGRESS for the rest.
>>>
>>
>> I'm now confused.
>>
>> I looked at several DMA driver implementations.
>>
>> 1. They call dma_cookie_status function to see if the job is done.
>> 2. If done, they return right ahead.
>> 3. Otherwise, dma_cookie_status returns DMA_IN_PROGRESS.
>> 4. Next the code checks if the channel is paused and return value is
>> DMA_IN_PROGRESS. The code changes return code to DMA_PAUSED.
>>
>> Whereas, I was returning paused first before even checking if the
>> descriptor is done. Are you OK with the sequence 1..4 above?
>
> Yes am okay with this with slight change in 4.
>
> You should set to PAUSED only for current descriptor and not for the ones in
> queue
>
OK, I'll work on it.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists