[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1512081523180.3595@nanos>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:15:29 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/34] x86, pkeys: arch-specific protection bitsy
Dave,
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> +static inline int vma_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
Shouldn't this return something unsigned?
> +{
> + u16 pkey = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> + unsigned long vma_pkey_mask = VM_PKEY_BIT0 | VM_PKEY_BIT1 |
> + VM_PKEY_BIT2 | VM_PKEY_BIT3;
> + /*
> + * ffs is one-based, not zero-based, so bias back down by 1.
> + */
> + int vm_pkey_shift = __builtin_ffsl(vma_pkey_mask) - 1;
Took me some time to figure out that this will resolve to a compile
time constant (hopefully). Is there a reason why we don't have a
VM_PKEY_SHIFT constant in the header file which makes that code just
simple and intuitive?
> + /*
> + * gcc generates better code if we do this rather than:
> + * pkey = (flags & mask) >> shift
> + */
> + pkey = (vma->vm_flags >> vm_pkey_shift) &
> + (vma_pkey_mask >> vm_pkey_shift);
My gcc (4.9) does it the other way round for whatever reason.
I really prefer to have this as simple as:
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
#define VM_PKEY_MASK (VM_PKEY_BIT0 | VM_PKEY_BIT1 | VM_PKEY_BIT2 | VM_PKEY_BIT3)
#define VM_PKEY_SHIFT
#else
#define VM_PKEY_MASK 0UL
#define VM_PKEY_SHIFT 0
#endif
static inline unsigned int vma_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
return (vma->vm_flags & VM_PKEY_MASK) >> VM_PKEY_SHIFT;
}
or
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
#define VM_PKEY_MASK (VM_PKEY_BIT0 | VM_PKEY_BIT1 | VM_PKEY_BIT2 | VM_PKEY_BIT3)
#define VM_PKEY_SHIFT
static inline unsigned int vma_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
return (vma->vm_flags & VM_PKEY_MASK) >> VM_PKEY_SHIFT;
}
#else
static inline unsigned int vma_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
return 0;
}
#endif
Hmm?
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists