linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] mtd: nand: jz4780: driver for NAND devices on JZ4780 SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <566701B8.4050800@imgtec.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:13:44 +0000
From:	Harvey Hunt <harvey.hunt@...tec.com>
To:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@...tec.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alex Smith <alex.smith@...tec.com>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] mtd: nand: jz4780: driver for NAND devices on
 JZ4780 SoCs



On 08/12/15 16:12, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:03:55 +0000
> Harvey Hunt <harvey.hunt@...tec.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> static void jz4780_nand_cmd_ctrl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd,
>>> 				 unsigned int ctrl)
>>> {
>>> 	struct jz4780_nand_chip *nand = to_jz4780_nand_chip(mtd);
>>> 	struct jz4780_nand_controller *nfc = to_jz4780_nand_controller(nand->chip.controller);
>>> 	struct jz4780_nand_cs *cs;
>>>
>>> 	if (WARN_ON(nfc->selected < 0))
>>> 		return;
>>>
>>> 	cs = &nfc->cs[nfc->selected];
>>>
>>> 	if (ctrl & NAND_CTRL_CHANGE) {
>>> 		if (cmd != NAND_CMD_NONE) {
>>> 			if (ctrl & NAND_ALE)
>>> 				writeb(cmd, cs->base + OFFSET_ADDR);
>>> 			else if (ctrl & NAND_CLE)
>>> 				writeb(cmd, cs->base + OFFSET_CMD);
>>> 		}
>>>
>>> 		jz4780_nemc_assert(nfc->dev, cs->bank, ctrl & NAND_NCE);
>>> 	}
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> Okay, I understand your point now. I would also have to implement the
>> read/write functions to replace the defaults, correct? If so, it feels
>> strange to add functions to reimplement the default ones.
>
> I don't think you have to re-implement the {read,write}_{byte,buf,word}
> functions, because you'll still assign the ->IO_ADDR_W and ->IO_ADDR_R
> fields to cs->base + OFFSET_DATA in jz4780_nand_init_chip(), but maybe
> I'm missing something.
>

You're right, I forgot about that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/