linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: at_hdmac: fix dma_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJN_NGbpeAA-JCtfUhF+VXbXkO6dGbg+=V1Wu_C7ULvr2sN8jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:23:06 +0300
From:	Dmitry Krivenok <krivenok.dmitry@...il.com>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: at_hdmac: fix dma_addr_t printing

>> A recent patch tried to improve the printk output of the atc_dump_lli()
>> function but introduced a bug

BTW, my original patch was created for mainline and was incorrectly
applied to slave-dma.git for-linus branch (I sent Vinod an email about
that).
In that branch the code was already changed so that my patch didn't
make sense there.
Now you seem to revert the change that was originally made instead of
revering my 1 line change:) Is that intentional?

Thanks,
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/