[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151208163406.B34683FB25@swsrvapps-01.diasemi.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:28:39 +0000
From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
To: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
LINUXKERNEL <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RTC-LINUX <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>
CC: David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: [PATCH V1] rtc: da9063: access ordering error during RTC interrupt
system power on
From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
This fix alters the ordering of the IRQ and device registrations in the RTC
driver probe function. This change will apply to the RTC driver that supports
both DA9063 and DA9062 PMICs.
A problem could occur with the existing RTC driver if:
A system is started from a cold boot using the PMIC RTC IRQ to initiate a
power on operation. For instance, if an RTC alarm is used to start a
platform from power off.
The existing driver IRQ is requested before the device has been properly
registered.
i.e.
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq()
comes before
rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_device_register();
In this case, the interrupt can be called before the device has been
registered and the handler can be called immediately. The IRQ handler
da9063_alarm_event() contains the function call
rtc_update_irq(rtc->rtc_dev, 1, RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF);
which in turn tries to access the unavailable rtc->rtc_dev.
The fix is to reorder the functions inside the RTC probe. The IRQ is
requested after the RTC device resource has been registered so that
get_irq_byname is the last thing to happen.
Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
---
This patch applies against linux-next and v4.4-rc4
Regards,
Steve
drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c | 19 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c
index 284b587..d6c853b 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c
@@ -483,24 +483,23 @@ static int da9063_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
+ rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, DA9063_DRVNAME_RTC,
+ &da9063_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
+ if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev))
+ return PTR_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev);
+
+ da9063_data_to_tm(data, &rtc->alarm_time, rtc);
+ rtc->rtc_sync = false;
+
irq_alarm = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "ALARM");
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq_alarm, NULL,
da9063_alarm_event,
IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
"ALARM", rtc);
- if (ret) {
+ if (ret)
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request ALARM IRQ %d: %d\n",
irq_alarm, ret);
- return ret;
- }
-
- rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, DA9063_DRVNAME_RTC,
- &da9063_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
- if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev))
- return PTR_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev);
- da9063_data_to_tm(data, &rtc->alarm_time, rtc);
- rtc->rtc_sync = false;
return ret;
}
--
end-of-patch for PATCH V1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists