linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] mfd: tps65912: Driver rewrite with DT support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151208191657.GA5727@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:16:57 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] mfd: tps65912: Driver rewrite with DT support

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:58:47PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:

> As all of this driver should be taken though the MFD tree how
> can this gpiolib change be handled? If we have gpio.parent it
> will not build on MFD, with gpio.dev it will fail to build when
> the changes are merged from the gpio subsystem. As the change
> has not been merged into linux-next as far a I can tell maybe
> this should be taken as is, then when the gpiolib change is
> made this can be changed with all the other drivers?

Do a cross tree merge in one direction or the other between MFD and GPIO.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)