[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1512082202400.3595@nanos>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 22:02:55 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1] x86: rtc_cmos platform device requires
legacy irqs
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 04/12/15 14:06, David Vrabel wrote:
> > On 03/12/15 10:43, David Vrabel wrote:
> >> Adding the rtc platform device when there are no legacy irqs (no
> >> legacy PIC) causes a conflict with other devices that end up using the
> >> same irq number.
> >
> > An alternative is to remove the rtc_cmos platform device in Xen PV
> > guests.
> >
> > Any preference on how this regression should be fixed?
> >
> > David
> >
> > 8<--------------------------
> > x86: Xen PV guests don't have the rtc_cmos platform device
> >
> [...]
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> > @@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ static __init int add_rtc_cmos(void)
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > + if (xen_pv_domain())
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
>
> Note there's a missing include that breaks !XEN builds.
What's the state of this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists