[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA9_cmcGbnzKLufKwT-LE_=82L2PTJ8bjfQCkPUhMxDA31ixmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:30:19 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
"Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover
from machine checks
[ adding nvdimm folks ]
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:53:13AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> > > +extern phys_addr_t mcsafe_memcpy(void *dst, const void __user *src,
>> > > + unsigned size);
>> >
>> > So what's the longer term purpose, where will mcsafe_memcpy() be used?
>>
>> The initial plan is to use this for file systems backed by NVDIMMs. They will
>> have a large amount of memory, and we have a practical recovery path - return
>> -EIO just like legacy h/w.
>>
>> We can look for other places in the kernel where we read large amounts of memory
>> and have some idea how to recover if the memory turns out to be bad.
>
> I see, that's sensible!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
Is that an "Acked-by"? I'd like to pull this plus Vishal's
gendisk-badblocks patches into a unified libnvdimm-error-handling
branch. We're looking to have v4.5 able to avoid or survive nvdimm
media errors through the pmem driver and DAX paths.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists