[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151209023844.GA24736@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:38:44 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
wfg@...ux.intel.com, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:36:32AM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
>
> Without knowing your exact implementation plans: introducing an
> additional reference indirection for every lookup will have a
> huge performance penalty as well.
>
> Is your plan to only introduce the master table after an
> allocation has failed?
Right, obviously the extra indirections would only come into play
after a failed allocation. As soon as we can run the worker thread
it'll try to remove the extra indirections by doing vmalloc.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists