linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHpGcM+eADwnuFLzqZztxhx_yZWb+m7uQt1o=X0y6oV7xDhUDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 2015 23:53:49 +0100
From:	Andreas Grünbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree

2015-12-09 23:20 GMT+01:00 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>:
> OK, I wrote all that and then I realised that the preferred names
> (XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_..) have been in Linus' tree for a long time (in
> include/uapi/linux/xattr.h), so you could just change the orangefs tree
> to use those already. i.e. my patch should apply cleanly to the
> orangefs tree and build and work correctly independently of the vfs
> tree change (I think).

Yes, I think that would be best.

Thanks, in particular for all the linux-next work!

Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/