[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5668BCB0.2060706@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:43:44 -0800
From: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Knights Landing uncore PMU
support
On 12/09/2015 03:37 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:03:43PM -0800, Harish Chegondi wrote:
>>
>> On 12/08/2015 01:07 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:32:32PM -0800, Harish Chegondi wrote:
>>>> @@ -981,6 +990,8 @@ static int __init uncore_pci_init(void)
>>>> break;
>>>> case 61: /* Broadwell */
>>>> ret = bdw_uncore_pci_init();
>>>> + case 87: /* Knights Landing */
>>>> + ret = knl_uncore_pci_init();
>>>> break;
>>>> default:
>>>> return 0;
>>>> @@ -1289,6 +1300,8 @@ static int __init uncore_cpu_init(void)
>>>> break;
>>>> case 86: /* BDX-DE */
>>>> bdx_uncore_cpu_init();
>>>> + case 87: /* Knights Landing */
>>>> + knl_uncore_cpu_init();
>>>> break;
>>>> default:
>>> Surely you need some extra break statements in there?
>>> .
>>>
>> Yes, I missed the break statements. I will add the breaks in the next version of the patch.
> Fixed it already. No need to resend.
> .
>
Thank you very much!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists