[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151209083209.GB15254@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:32:10 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: x86 fpu: command-line parameters broken post-FPU-rewrite
* Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
> Hey Ingo,
>
> We were starting to look at reenabling XSAVES support and tried to use the
> 'noxsave' and 'noxsaves' kernel command-line options. The rewrite moved the FPU
> initialization to before we even are parsing command-line options, even the
> early_param()s.
>
> Do you have any preferences on how it gets fixed?
>
> The most obvious thing would be to just defer as much of the FPU setup as we can
> until after parse_early_param() has happened. The only other think I can think
> of doing would be to try to do some *really* early, simple, command-line parsing
> to look for 'noxsave' and friends.
>
> Thoughts?
Hm, so given that having the FPU operational is key to a functioning kernel (and
other kernel subsystems may make use of FPU functionality), I'd rather bring
option parsing earlier than change the FPU setup sequence. FPU setup should be
done when we identify the CPU - not 'very late' as we used to.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists