linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 118/126] md/raid0: apply base queue limits *before* disk_stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed,  9 Dec 2015 09:38:08 +0000
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 118/126] md/raid0: apply base queue limits *before* disk_stack_limits

3.16.7-ckt21 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>

commit 66eefe5de11db1e0d8f2edc3880d50e7c36a9d43 upstream.

Calling e.g. blk_queue_max_hw_sectors() after calls to
disk_stack_limits() discards the settings determined by
disk_stack_limits().
So we need to make those calls first.

Fixes: 199dc6ed5179 ("md/raid0: update queue parameter in a safer location.")
Reported-by: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
[ luis: backported to 3.16: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/md/raid0.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid0.c b/drivers/md/raid0.c
index 3d6b97b6dc6f..8f7dfc58f965 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid0.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid0.c
@@ -437,12 +437,6 @@ static int raid0_run(struct mddev *mddev)
 		mddev->private = conf;
 	}
 	conf = mddev->private;
-	rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
-		disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
-				  rdev->data_offset << 9);
-		if (blk_queue_discard(bdev_get_queue(rdev->bdev)))
-			discard_supported = true;
-	}
 	blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors);
 	blk_queue_max_write_same_sectors(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors);
 	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(mddev->queue, mddev->chunk_sectors);
@@ -451,6 +445,13 @@ static int raid0_run(struct mddev *mddev)
 	blk_queue_io_opt(mddev->queue,
 			 (mddev->chunk_sectors << 9) * mddev->raid_disks);
 
+	rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
+		disk_stack_limits(mddev->gendisk, rdev->bdev,
+				  rdev->data_offset << 9);
+		if (blk_queue_discard(bdev_get_queue(rdev->bdev)))
+			discard_supported = true;
+	}
+
 	if (!discard_supported)
 		queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, mddev->queue);
 	else
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/