[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151209130204.GD30907@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:02:05 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: isolate_lru_page on !head pages
Hi Kirill,
while looking at the issue reported by Minchan [1] I have noticed that
there is nothing to prevent from "isolating" a tail page from LRU because
isolate_lru_page checks PageLRU which is
PAGEFLAG(LRU, lru, PF_HEAD)
so it is checked on the head page rather than the given page directly
but the rest of the operation is done on the given (tail) page.
This is really subtle because this expects that every caller of this
function checks for the tail page otherwise we would clobber statistics
and who knows what else (I haven't checked that in detail) as the page
cannot be on the LRU list and the operation makes sense only on the head
page.
Would it make more sense to make PageLRU PF_ANY? That would return
false for PageLRU on any tail page and so it would be ignored by
isolate_lru_page.
I haven't checked other flags but there might be a similar situation. I
am wondering whether it is really a good idea to perform a flag check on
a different page then the operation which depends on the result of the
test in general. It sounds like a maintenance horror to me.
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151201133455.GB27574@bbox
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists