[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56682E44.6020303@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 22:36:04 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Cc: k.kozlowski.k@...il.com,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: exynos5422: add missing parent GSCL
block clocks
W dniu 09.12.2015 o 19:14, Sylwester Nawrocki pisze:
> Adding Stephen and linux-clk at Cc.
>
> On 09/12/15 05:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08.12.2015 22:46, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>> This patch adds clocks, which are required for preserving parent clock
>>>> configuration on GSCL power domain on/off.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 8 ++++----
>>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h | 2 ++
>>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> I suppose that, with ack from clock folks, this can go through samsung-soc?
>
> I guess it makes more sense that making a stable branch with just
> this patch to be pulled into arm-soc and clk tree. I'm fine with
> applying this patch through arm-soc, but I think we also need
> Mike's or Stephen ack for this.
>
> Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
I am fine with the branch approach (actually in such cases I make them
anyway just in case).
As you suggested I'll wait for Mike's or Stepen's acks.
BR,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists