linux-kernel - Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:03:57 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>, dzickus@...hat.com,
	dsahern@...il.com, fweisbec@...il.com, efault@....de,
	paulus@...ba.org, rfowles@...hat.com, eranian@...gle.com,
	"acme@...nel.org >> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...nel.org>,
	mingo@...hat.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	"wangnan0@...wei.com >> Wang Nan" <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
	fowles@...each.com, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c?

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:02:44AM -0500, Joe Mario wrote:
> Yes, that would be a great enhancement,

This is hardly new though; I've outlined the very same the first time
the c2c thing got mentioned.

> but is it any reason to hold up the current implementation?

I just wonder how much of c2c is still useful once we get it done
proper. And once such a tool is out there, its hard to kill, leaving us
with a maintenance burden we could do without.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/