linux-kernel - Re: m(un)map kmalloc buffers to userspace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:07:50 +0100
From:	Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
CC:	Sebastian Frias <sebastian_frias@...madesigns.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: m(un)map kmalloc buffers to userspace

On 09/12/2015 14:55, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 08-12-15 18:25:31, Sebastian Frias wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are porting a driver from Linux 3.4.39+ to 4.1.13+, CPU is Cortex-A9.
>>
>> The driver maps kmalloc'ed memory to user space.
> 
> This sounds like a terrible idea to me. Why don't you simply use the
> page allocator directly? Try to imagine what would happen if you mmaped
> a kmalloc with a size which is not page aligned? mmaped memory uses
> whole page granularity.

According to the source code, this kernel module calls

  kmalloc(1 << 17, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT);

I suppose kmalloc() would return page-aligned memory?

(Note: the kernel module was originally written for 2.4 and was updated
inconsistently over the years.)

Regards.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/