linux-kernel - Re: [tip:perf/core] perf: Add pmu specific data for perf task context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151209151428.GQ6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:14:28 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
	"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf: Add pmu specific data for perf task context

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:59:21PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index
> > 36babfd..97aa610 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -3508,11 +3515,6 @@ retry:
> >  		if (!ctx)
> >  			goto errout;
> > 
> > -		if (task_ctx_data) {
> > -			ctx->task_ctx_data = task_ctx_data;
> > -			task_ctx_data = NULL;
> > -		}
> > -
> >  		err = 0;
> >  		mutex_lock(&task->perf_event_mutex);
> >  		/*
> > @@ -3526,6 +3528,10 @@ retry:
> >  		else {
> >  			get_ctx(ctx);
> >  			++ctx->pin_count;
> > +			if (task_ctx_data) {
> > +				ctx->task_ctx_data = task_ctx_data;
> > +				task_ctx_data = NULL;
> > +			}
> >  			rcu_assign_pointer(task->perf_event_ctxp[ctxn],
> > ctx);
> >  		}
> >  		mutex_unlock(&task->perf_event_mutex);
> > 
> > 
> > Does that make sense? No point in setting task_ctx_data if we're going to
> > free the ctx and try again.
> 
> The task_ctx_data will be checked before use. So it wouldn't crash the
> system if it's NULL.

Yeah, I know, I checked :-)

> The problem is that LBR stack info will not be save/store on context
> switch anymore. The user probably get wrong call stack information.

Yep

> May I know why you want to do that?

Because this seemed like a less fragile construct. When there's multiple
event creations racing it seems possible (ableit entirely unlikely) to
assign the allocated task_ctx_data to a ctx that we'll delete, and on
the second go around re-allocate a ctx, but are left wihtout
task_ctx_data to assign to it.

So by only assigning the task_ctx_data when we _know_ we've succeeded,
we'll avoid this scenario.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/