[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56684595.4040402@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:15:33 -0500
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>, x86@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
mingo@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: Xen PV guests don't have the rtc_cmos
platform device
On 12/09/2015 10:00 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 2015-12-09 15:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 09.12.15 at 15:32, <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com> wrote:
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
>>> @@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ static __init int add_rtc_cmos(void)
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> + if (paravirt_enabled())
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>
>> What about Xen Dom0?
>>
>> Jan
>
> Checked that in my testing and that still worked:
> [ 16.733837] rtc_cmos 00:02: RTC can wake from S4
> [ 16.734030] rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0
> [ 16.734087] rtc_cmos 00:02: alarms up to one month, y3k, 114 bytes
> nvram
> [ 17.760329] rtc_cmos 00:02: setting system clock to 2015-12-09
> 08:43:48 UTC (1449650628)
>
> and /dev/rtc and /dev/rtc0 both exist.
>
> But i don't know the nitty gritty details about why ...
That's because it is discovered by ACPI earlier. I don't know though
whether we can always assume this will be the case.
-boris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists