lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:35:53 +0100
From:	Sebastian Frias <sebastian_frias@...madesigns.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
CC:	Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: m(un)map kmalloc buffers to userspace

On 12/09/2015 04:12 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 09-12-15 15:53:22, Sebastian Frias wrote:
> [...]
>> 2) Now that VM_RESERVED was removed, is there another recommended flag to
>> replace it for the purposes above?
>
> VM_IO + potentially others depending on your usecase.
>
>> 3) Since it was working before, we suppose that something that was
>> previously done by default on the kernel it is not done anymore, could that
>> be a remap_pfn_range during mmap or kmalloc?
>
> VM_RESERVED removal was a cleanup which has removed the flag because it
> was not needed and the same effect could be implied from either VM_IO or
> VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP. See 314e51b9851b ("mm: kill vma flag
> VM_RESERVED and mm->reserved_vm counter") for more detailed information.
>
>> 4) We tried using remap_pfn_range inside mmap and while it seems to work, we
>> still get occasional crashes due to corrupted memory (in this case the
>> behaviour is the same between 4.1 and 3.4 when using the same modified
>> driver), are we missing something?
>
> This is hard to tell without knowing your driver. I would just encourage
> you to look at other drivers which map kernel memory to userspace via
> mmap. There are many of them. Maybe you can find a pattern which suites
> your usecase.
>

Ok, thanks.
We've seen that drivers/media/pci/zoran/zoran_driver.c for example seems 
to be doing as us kmalloc+remap_pfn_range, is there any guarantee (or at 
least an advised heuristic) to determine if a driver is "current" (ie: 
uses the latest APIs and works)?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ