[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1449683825.15946.207.camel@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 11:57:05 -0600
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Crash caused by "EDAC: Rip out the edac_subsys reference
counting" (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 8)
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 18:38 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:50:09AM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > It's not "a driver's probe function". There is no driver whose .probe()
> > is
> > mpc85xx_pci_err_probe() -- the name is historical.
>
> From looking at it, it behaves a lot like a probe function. Irrespective
> of what it is or it isn't, calling it from outside a driver which can be
> built as a module is a no-no. So I'd appreciate it if someone could test
> Johannes' patch on the relevant hardware.
Thanks for pointing the patch out -- it wasn't posted to linuxppc-dev so I
would have missed it otherwise. I don't need to test it to see that it's
broken -- we can't have two drivers binding to the same device, which is the
reason why the current situation exists.
I recall at the time suggesting that the PCIe controller driver instantiate a
platform device for the EDAC driver to bind to -- it looks like that's what
we'll need to do.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists