linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] ppc: Implement save_stack_trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151208192844.70fb33e6@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:28:44 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	chuhu@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ppc: Implement save_stack_trace_regs()

On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 11:20:22 +1100
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:

> On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 13:50 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> > It has come to my attention that kprobe event stack tracing does not
> > work on powerpc.  
> 
> Yep looks like you're right. I didn't realise it was separate from the regular
> stack trace stuff.
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
> > index ea43a347a104..0142c86801ba 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
> > @@ -61,3 +61,10 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
> >  	save_context_stack(trace, tsk->thread.ksp, tsk, 0);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace_tsk);
> > +
> > +void
> > +save_stack_trace_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct stack_trace *trace)
> > +{
> > +	save_context_stack(trace, regs->gpr[PT_R1], current, 0);  
> 
> In the kernel we would normally use just '1' here rather than 'PT_R1', but it's
> not a huge deal.
> 
> Should I take this via powerpc or do you want it to go in via tracing?
> 

You can take it. And you can replace the PT_R1 if you want. I just
noticed that it was defined, and I try to use macro names instead of
hard coded numbers. I was actually looking for a "PT_SP" :-)

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/