linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Remove duplicate syscall table for fast path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:53:55 -0800
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Remove duplicate syscall table for fast path

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
> Instead of using a duplicate syscall table for the fast path, create stubs for
> the syscalls that need pt_regs that save the extra registers if a flag for the
> slow path is not set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
> To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> Applies on top of Andy's syscall cleanup series.

A couple questions:

> @@ -306,15 +306,37 @@ END(entry_SYSCALL_64)
>
>  ENTRY(stub_ptregs_64)
>         /*
> -        * Syscalls marked as needing ptregs that go through the fast path
> -        * land here.  We transfer to the slow path.
> +        * Syscalls marked as needing ptregs land here.
> +        * If we are on the fast path, we need to save the extra regs.
> +        * If we are on the slow path, the extra regs are already saved.
>          */
> -       DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
> -       TRACE_IRQS_OFF
> -       addq    $8, %rsp
> -       jmp     entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path
> +       movq    PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack), %r10
> +       testl   $TS_SLOWPATH, ASM_THREAD_INFO(TI_status, %r10, 0)
> +       jnz     1f

OK (but see below), but why not do:

addq $8, %rsp
jmp entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path

here instead of the stack munging below?

> +       subq    $SIZEOF_PTREGS, %r10
> +       SAVE_EXTRA_REGS base=r10
> +       movq    %r10, %rbx
> +       call    *%rax
> +       movq    %rbx, %r10
> +       RESTORE_EXTRA_REGS base=r10
> +       ret
> +1:
> +       jmp     *%rax
>  END(stub_ptregs_64)

Also, can we not get away with keying off rip or rsp instead of
ti->status?  That should be faster and less magical IMO.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/