[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBT-ws9tmAa=guJHXzcnK9frPiXkqQXbH81pxROPomAdLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 11:48:21 -0800
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Richard Fowles <rfowles@...hat.com>,
"acme@...nel.org >> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"wangnan0@...wei.com >> Wang Nan" <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Richard Fowles <fowles@...each.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c?
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>> If I recall the c2c tool is giving you more than the bouncing line. It shows you
>> the offset inside the line and the participating CPUs.
>
> On Haswell and later you could get the same with the normal address
> reporting. The events above support DLA.
>
I know the events track the condition better than just with the
latency threshold.
I think what it boils down to is not so much the PMU side but rather
the tool side.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists