linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/3] reduce latency of direct async compaction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151210043556.GA19062@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:35:57 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
Cc:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] reduce latency of direct async compaction

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:40:06PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:33:53AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:52:42PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 03:51:16PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > > I add work-around for this problem at isolate_freepages(). Please test
> > > > following one.
> > > 
> > > Still no luck and the error is about the same:
> > 
> > There is a mistake... Could you insert () for
> > cc->free_pfn & ~(pageblock_nr_pages-1) like as following?
> > 
> > cc->free_pfn == (cc->free_pfn & ~(pageblock_nr_pages-1))
> 
> Oh right, of course.
> 
> Good news, the result is much better now:
> $ cat {0..8}/swap
> cmdline: /lkp/aaron/src/bin/usemem 100064603136
> 100064603136 transferred in 72 seconds, throughput: 1325 MB/s
> cmdline: /lkp/aaron/src/bin/usemem 100072049664
> 100072049664 transferred in 74 seconds, throughput: 1289 MB/s
> cmdline: /lkp/aaron/src/bin/usemem 100070246400
> 100070246400 transferred in 92 seconds, throughput: 1037 MB/s
> cmdline: /lkp/aaron/src/bin/usemem 100069545984
> 100069545984 transferred in 81 seconds, throughput: 1178 MB/s
> cmdline: /lkp/aaron/src/bin/usemem 100058895360
> 100058895360 transferred in 78 seconds, throughput: 1223 MB/s
> cmdline: /lkp/aaron/src/bin/usemem 100066074624
> 100066074624 transferred in 94 seconds, throughput: 1015 MB/s
> cmdline: /lkp/aaron/src/bin/usemem 100062855168
> 100062855168 transferred in 77 seconds, throughput: 1239 MB/s
> cmdline: /lkp/aaron/src/bin/usemem 100060990464
> 100060990464 transferred in 73 seconds, throughput: 1307 MB/s
> cmdline: /lkp/aaron/src/bin/usemem 100064996352
> 100064996352 transferred in 84 seconds, throughput: 1136 MB/s
> Max: 1325 MB/s
> Min: 1015 MB/s
> Avg: 1194 MB/s

Nice result! Thanks for testing.
I will make a proper formatted patch soon.

Then, your concern is solved? I think that performance of
always-always on this test case can't follow up performance of
always-never because migration cost to make hugepage is additionally
charged to always-always case. Instead, it will have more hugepage
mapping and it may result in better performance in some situation.
I guess that it is intention of that option.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/