[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151210071022.GA31969@1wt.eu>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:10:22 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] fs: clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:06:35AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> Why not add a new file flag instead ?
>
> Something like this (editing your patch by hand to illustrate) :
(...)
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 3aa514254161..409bd7047e7e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -913,3 +913,4 @@
> #define FL_OFDLCK 1024 /* lock is "owned" by struct file */
> #define FL_LAYOUT 2048 /* outstanding pNFS layout */
> +#define FL_DROP_PRIVS 4096 /* lest something weird decides that 2 is OK */
Crap, these ones are for locks, we need to use O_* instead
But anyway you get the idea, I mean there are probably many spare bits
overthere.
Another option I was thinking about was to change f_mode and detect the
change on close. But I don't know what to compare it against.
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists