[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5668CADE.8090706@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:44:14 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
kgene@...nel.org
Cc: kyungmin.park@...sung.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de, linux.amoon@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/19] ARM: dts: Add DMC bus node for Exynos3250
On 09.12.2015 13:07, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch adds the DMC (Dynamic Memory Controller) bus node for Exynos3250 SoC.
> The DMC is an AMBA AXI-compliant slave to interface external JEDEC standard
> SDRAM devices. The bus includes the OPP tables and the source clock for DMC
> block.
>
> Following list specifies the detailed relation between the clock and DMC block:
> - The source clock of DMC block : div_dmc
>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> index 2f30d632f1cc..7214c5e42150 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> @@ -687,6 +687,40 @@
> clock-names = "ppmu";
> status = "disabled";
> };
> +
> + bus_dmc: bus_dmc {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos-bus";
> + clocks = <&cmu_dmc CLK_DIV_DMC>;
> + clock-names = "bus";
> + operating-points-v2 = <&bus_dmc_opp_table>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + bus_dmc_opp_table: opp_table1 {
This is the firsy opp_table, right? So:
s/opp_table1/opp_table0/
> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> + opp-shared;
> +
> + opp00 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <50000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> + };
> + opp01 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> + };
> + opp02 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <134000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
Why 134, not 133 MHz?
> + };
> + opp03 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <200000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
Shouldn't this be 825 mV, not 800? I think we used previously that value
for our devices.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
> + };
> + opp04 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <875000>;
> + };
> + };
> };
> };
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists