[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <566948F6.80904@wimdewith.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:42:14 +0100
From: Wim de With <nauxuron@...dewith.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm72xx: add userspace data struct
On 10-12-2015 10:37, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:11:12AM +0100, Wim de With wrote:
>> @@ -482,8 +483,16 @@ static int gdm_wimax_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
>> /* NOTE: gdm_update_fsm should be called
>> * before gdm_wimax_ioctl_set_data is called.
>> */
>> - gdm_update_fsm(dev,
>> - req->data.buf);
>> + fsm_buf = kmalloc(sizeof(fsm_s), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!fsm_buf)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + if (copy_from_user(fsm_buf, req->data.buf,
>> + sizeof(fsm_s))) {
>> + kfree(fsm_buf);
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + }
>> + gdm_update_fsm(dev, fsm_buf);
>> + kfree(fsm_buf);
>
>
> No. This change is a bug.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
But what if I just keep it as:
gdm_update_fsm(dev, req->data.buf)
Then it would just trust a __user pointer right?
Wim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists