lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:42:14 +0100
From:	Wim de With <nauxuron@...dewith.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm72xx: add userspace data struct

On 10-12-2015 10:37, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:11:12AM +0100, Wim de With wrote:
>> @@ -482,8 +483,16 @@ static int gdm_wimax_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
>>  				/* NOTE: gdm_update_fsm should be called
>>  				 * before gdm_wimax_ioctl_set_data is called.
>>  				 */
>> -				gdm_update_fsm(dev,
>> -					       req->data.buf);
>> +				fsm_buf = kmalloc(sizeof(fsm_s), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +				if (!fsm_buf)
>> +					return -ENOMEM;
>> +				if (copy_from_user(fsm_buf, req->data.buf,
>> +						   sizeof(fsm_s))) {
>> +					kfree(fsm_buf);
>> +					return -EFAULT;
>> +				}
>> +				gdm_update_fsm(dev, fsm_buf);
>> +				kfree(fsm_buf);
> 
> 
> No.  This change is a bug.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

But what if I just keep it as:

	gdm_update_fsm(dev, req->data.buf)

Then it would just trust a __user pointer right?

Wim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ