[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1449747069.16068.27.camel@tiscali.nl>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:31:09 +0100
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
syzkaller@...glegroups.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>,
isdn4linux@...tserv.isdn4linux.de,
gigaset307x-common@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ser_gigaset fixes
Hi Tilman,
On di, 2015-12-08 at 12:00 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> this series is the result of our discussion on the "freeing an
> active object" bug. I split my proposed patch into two patches
> for the separate topics of moving the ser_cardstate kfree() and
> dropping the useless kfree()s, and also included an unrelated
> patch (1/3) that had fallen through the cracks in my last series.
>
> Patch 2/3 should go into stable releases all the way back to 2.6.32.
> It applies cleanly to release 3.*/4.* with at most offset 1.
> For release 2.6.32 there is a trivial merge conflict with a removed
> comment line.
1/3 ran into objections and, I think, Alan Cox is working on an
alternative for it. Would you mind resending 2/3 and 3/3 as a two
patches series? Feel free to add
Acked-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
to both.
(The previous gigaset series, which you sent in July this year, was
picked up from netdev directly by David Miller. Unless people actually
prefer these patches to also be signed-off by me, I'm perfectly fine
with that.)
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists