[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5669680E.4070304@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:54:54 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: "Geyslan G. Bem" <geyslan@...il.com>, peter.senna@...il.com
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9v2] usb: host: ehci.h: fix single statement macros
Hello.
On 12/10/2015 1:32 AM, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
> Don't use the 'do {} while (0)' wrapper in a single statement macro.
>
> Caught by checkpatch: "WARNING: Single statement macros should not
> use a do {} while (0) loop"
>
> Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem <geyslan@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/ehci.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci.h b/drivers/usb/host/ehci.h
> index cfeebd8..945000a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci.h
> @@ -244,9 +244,9 @@ struct ehci_hcd { /* one per controller */
> /* irq statistics */
> #ifdef EHCI_STATS
> struct ehci_stats stats;
> -# define COUNT(x) do { (x)++; } while (0)
> +# define COUNT(x) ((x)++)
> #else
> -# define COUNT(x) do {} while (0)
> +# define COUNT(x) ((void) 0)
Why not just empty #define?
[...]
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists