linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] cpufreq: Introduce ST's CPUFreq driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151210021207.GC29459@ubuntu>
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:42:07 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...inux.com, maxime.coquelin@...com,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, ajitpal.singh@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] cpufreq: Introduce ST's CPUFreq driver

On 09-12-15, 15:58, Lee Jones wrote:
> This is a re-write of the original submission, hence why the
> change-log is omitted.  Basically almost everything has changed.
> We are now using the new OPP framework and generic bindings
> written by Viresh.
> 
> There are 'ARM' patches in the set which are not necessarily
> related to CPUFreq, but are required to get it to work. Anyone
> who is not interested in general STi DT changes can safely
> ignore these.

Apart from minor comments in the 8th patch, everything else looks
fine.

Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/