linux-kernel - Re: LM90 driver and ti tmp461 detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151210180928.GC28022@awelinux>
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:09:28 +0100
From:	Andreas Werner <andreas.werner@....de>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC:	Andreas Werner <andreas.werner@....de>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jdelvare@...e.com>,
	<lm-sensors@...sensors.org>, <wni@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: LM90 driver and ti tmp461 detection

...
>On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 09:49:43AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> >I have a DT based board yes, but i have also planed to submit my changes
> >and also wanted to implement the autodetection of the chip.
> >
> >I have also planned (or need) to implement the "n-Factor Correction" for the
> >CPU diodes. There is a register to set this value in the tmp451 and tmp461.
> >Would that make sense to add a DT property for the driver to be able
> >to set this value? What do you think?
> >
> 
> See max6697.c for some examples. Maybe we can use similar bindings.
> 

Seems to be a good way. I think I will also add the extended mode selection
via DT.

> Guenter
> 

Regards
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/