linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #3]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5669C2A1.8040602@ahsoftware.de>
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:21:21 +0100
From:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, jmorris@...ei.org,
	David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #3]

Am 10.12.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:

> We already have one other report of this problem hitting them.  I've now
> released 4.3.2-rc1, with a "quick" review period of 24 hours before I
> release 4.3.2 with just this fix.  If you could verify I didn't mess
> anything up I would appreciate it.

After applying those two patches from 4.3.2-rc1 you've posted instead of 
the one I've cherry-picked, git diff ended up with no difference to the 
source of the kernel I'm currently running. Reading those two patches 
also looks good.

Thanks a lot.

Alexander Holler

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/