[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5669C796.5010406@sandisk.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:42:30 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <sagig@....mellanox.co.il>, <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
<axboe@...com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] IB/srpt: chain RDMA READ/WRITE requests
On 12/07/2015 12:51 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Remove struct rdma_iu and instead allocate the struct ib_rdma_wr array
> early and fill out directly. This allows us to chain the WRs, and thus
> archive both less lock contention on the HCA workqueue as well as much
^^^^^^^
Did you perhaps intend "achieve" ?
> struct srpt_send_ioctx {
> struct srpt_ioctx ioctx;
> struct srpt_rdma_ch *ch;
> - struct rdma_iu *rdma_ius;
> + struct ib_rdma_wr *rdma_ius;
Please rename the "rdma_ius" member into "wr" or any other name that
shows that this member is now a work request array and nothing else.
Otherwise this patch looks fine to me.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists