linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] osd: fix signed char versus %02x issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1449775559.12972.11.camel@perches.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:25:59 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Boaz Harrosh <ooo@...ctrozaur.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>, osd-dev@...n-osd.org,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] osd: fix signed char versus %02x issue

On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 14:13 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > > > > > "Andy" == Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> writes:
> 
> Andy> I have several patches on SCSI subsytem like this one. Some of
> Andy> them didn't manage kernel (even having Ack!) for years already.
> Andy> Is it okay if I collect them together and send a bunch once again
> 
> Re-sending to linux-scsi is fine. The trick is finding people willing to
> review them...

Generally speaking, it hasn't been for lack of review.

SCSI has been one of the slowest subsystems to apply
simple defect correction (not whitespace style) patches.

Mostly these patches have been ignored.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/