lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:05:02 +0530 From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org> Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org, cov@...eaurora.org, jcm@...hat.com, agross@...eaurora.org, arnd@...db.de, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 3/3] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA channel driver On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:10:48PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 12/5/2015 3:00 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:04:05PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > >>>>> You are missing the point. Channel can be paused, yes but the descriptor > >>>>> is in queue and is not paused. The descriptor running is paused, yes. > >>>>> There is subtle difference between these > >>> I'll follow your recommendation. PAUSE for the currently active > >>> descriptor and DMA_IN_PROGRESS for the rest. > >>> > >> > >> I'm now confused. > >> > >> I looked at several DMA driver implementations. > >> > >> 1. They call dma_cookie_status function to see if the job is done. > >> 2. If done, they return right ahead. > >> 3. Otherwise, dma_cookie_status returns DMA_IN_PROGRESS. > >> 4. Next the code checks if the channel is paused and return value is > >> DMA_IN_PROGRESS. The code changes return code to DMA_PAUSED. > >> > >> Whereas, I was returning paused first before even checking if the > >> descriptor is done. Are you OK with the sequence 1..4 above? > > > > Yes am okay with this with slight change in 4. > > > > You should set to PAUSED only for current descriptor and not for the ones in > > queue > > > > OK. I'll post a new version with this. Is there any other comment that > needed to be addressed? Looks okay to me -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists