[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151211095946.GC18828@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:59:46 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Pinski, Andrew" <Andrew.Pinski@...iumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: Commit 81a43adae3b9 (locking/mutex: Use acquire/release
semantics) causing failures on arm64 (ThunderX)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:43:46AM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> We are getting soft lockup OOPs on Cavium CN88XX (A.K.A. ThunderX), which is
> an arm64 implementation.
[...]
> At this point it is unknown if this patch is incorrect, or if the underlying
> ARM64 atomic_*_{acquire,release} primitives are defective, or if the problem
> lies elsewhere.
Are you using the ll/sc or lse versions of the atomics? In the case of
the former, are they inline or out-of-line (this depends on whether or
not you've selected CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS and whether or not you have
toolchain support)?
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists