linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nfs: Fix listxattr regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHc6FU6TpP76Dh=Vc9L4j4VPXHwTaRjF6p=LE6V5YNZQdV-9JA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:09:13 +0100
From:	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: Fix listxattr regression

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:15:46PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> Al,
>>
>> the xattr cleanup patches which are meanwhile in your for-next branch broke
>> listxattr on nfs.  Could you please add this fix?
>
> Umm...  Would you be OK with folding that into commit in question?  I'd
> rather not introduce a bisect hazard in the first place...

Yes sure, if you are okay with rebasing.

I assume that there is no point in reposting the xattr cleanups with
this fix included; if you would prefer a repost, let me know.

Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/