[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151211140201.GQ6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:02:01 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vince@...ter.net, eranian@...gle.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 3/5] perf: Introduce instruction trace filtering
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 03:36:36PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> The pmu driver interface basically adds an extra callback to the
> pmu driver structure, which validates the filter configuration proposed
> by the user against what the hardware is actually capable of doing
> and translates it into something that pmu::start can program into
> hardware.
> @@ -388,12 +393,38 @@ struct pmu {
> void (*free_aux) (void *aux); /* optional */
>
> /*
> + * Validate instruction tracing filters: make sure hw supports the
> + * requested configuration and number of filters.
> + *
> + * Configure instruction tracing filters: translate hw-agnostic filter
> + * into hardware configuration in event::hw::itrace_filters
> + */
> + int (*itrace_filter_setup) (struct perf_event *event); /* optional */
> +
> + /*
> * Filter events for PMU-specific reasons.
> */
> int (*filter_match) (struct perf_event *event); /* optional */
> };
Any reason you cannot use pmu::filter_match ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists