[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151211150236.GU6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:02:36 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vince@...ter.net, eranian@...gle.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 3/5] perf: Introduce instruction trace filtering
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 03:36:36PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> +static int perf_event_itrace_filters_setup(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * We can't use event_function_call() here, because that would
> + * require ctx::mutex, but one of our callers is called with
> + * mm::mmap_sem down, which would cause an inversion, see bullet
> + * (2) in put_event().
> + */
> + do {
> + if (READ_ONCE(event->state) != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
> + ret = event->pmu->itrace_filter_setup(event);
> + break;
So this is tricky, if its not active it can be any moment, there is
nothing serializing against that.
> + }
> +
> + /* matches smp_wmb() in event_sched_in() */
> + smp_rmb();
> +
> + ret = cpu_function_call(READ_ONCE(event->oncpu),
> + __perf_event_itrace_filters_setup, event);
This otoh, running with IRQs disabled on the CPU the thing is active on
guarantees it will not become inactive -- nothing can come in and switch
it off.
> + } while (ret == -EAGAIN);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists