[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wpslatut.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:27:22 +0200
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vince@...ter.net, eranian@...gle.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 3/5] perf: Introduce instruction trace filtering
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 03:36:36PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> +static int perf_event_itrace_filters_setup(struct perf_event *event)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We can't use event_function_call() here, because that would
>> + * require ctx::mutex, but one of our callers is called with
>> + * mm::mmap_sem down, which would cause an inversion, see bullet
>> + * (2) in put_event().
>> + */
>> + do {
>> + if (READ_ONCE(event->state) != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
>> + ret = event->pmu->itrace_filter_setup(event);
>> + break;
>
> So this is tricky, if its not active it can be any moment, there is
> nothing serializing against that.
Indeed. But we should be able to call pmu::itrace_filter_setup()
multiple times, so if after this we re-check that the event is still
inactive, we can return, otherwise proceed with the cross-call. Does
this make sense?
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* matches smp_wmb() in event_sched_in() */
>> + smp_rmb();
>> +
>> + ret = cpu_function_call(READ_ONCE(event->oncpu),
>> + __perf_event_itrace_filters_setup, event);
>
> This otoh, running with IRQs disabled on the CPU the thing is active on
> guarantees it will not become inactive -- nothing can come in and switch
> it off.
>
>> + } while (ret == -EAGAIN);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists