[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <n4f2vk$ds1$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 19:00:19 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Source code review around jump label usage
Le 11/12/2015 13:08, SF Markus Elfring a écrit :
> How does the text length distribution look like for the used jump targets?
>
> ╔════════╤═══════════╗
> ║ length │ incidence ║
> ╠════════╪═══════════╣
> ║ 1 │ 2 ║
> ║ 2 │ 29 ║
> ║ 3 │ 10640 ║
> ║ 4 │ 3564 ║
> ║ 5 │ 1714 ║
> ║ 6 │ 1162 ║
> ║ 7 │ 1245 ║
> ║ 8 │ 881 ║
> ║ 9 │ 787 ║
> ║ 10 │ 1252 ║
> ║ … │ … ║
> ║ 35 │ 4 ║
> ║ 36 │ 1 ║
> ║ 37 │ 2 ║
> ║ 38 │ 1 ║
> ║ 39 │ 1 ║
> ╚════════╧═══════════╝
>
Maybe having a look at the 1 or 2 chars long labels would make sense.
They are likely to be too short for being of any use.
IMHO, too long labels may also reduce readability.
Best regards,
CJ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists