lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:10:29 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: recordmcount: break hardlinks

On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:45:41 +0000
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:31:25AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 12:09:03 +0000
> > Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >   
> > > recordmcount edits the file in-place, which can cause problems when
> > > using ccache in hardlink mode.  Arrange for recordmcount to break a
> > > hardlinked object.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
> > > ---
> > > Steven, sorry it took a while to get this out...  
> > 
> > Should this be for stable, or is it fine to just add this to my 4.5
> > queue?  
> 
> I thought you wanted to test it first - although I've been running with
> this for a while now, my nightly builds have masked out the mcount
> warning, and I suspect it'll take a while for ccache to purge itself
> of the modified objects.
> 
> If you're happy to add a stable tag to it, then please do so.
> 

I ran it through most my tests (it's still running and is at 20 of 33
tests). If there was anything wrong with this patch, I'm sure one of my
tests would have crashed by now.

Do you want to take it, or shall I?

If you want to take it, you can add my:

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists