[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151211205951.GA29551@uranus>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 23:59:52 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm: Account anon mappings as RLIMIT_DATA
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:55:51PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > +static inline int anon_accountable_mapping(struct file *file, vm_flags_t vm_flags)
> > +{
> > + return !file &&
> > + (vm_flags & (VM_GROWSDOWN | VM_GROWSUP |
> > + VM_SHARED | VM_MAYSHARE)) == 0;
> > +}
>
> You're duplicating that "is it an anon accountable mapping" logic. I
> think you should move the inline helper function up, and use it in
> vm_stat_account().
>
> Other than that, I think the patch certainly looks clean and obvious
> enough. But I didn't actually try to *run* it, maybe it ends up not
> working due to something I don't see.
Thank for the note, Linus! I tried to play with it a little bit,
but I need to test it more first. I sent it simply to be sure
that i'm moving in right direction. Once I get reviewed all things
again and test it more deeply, I'll send a new patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists